I have a thought: Have Clinton and all his officials subpoenaed to testify in court why Clinton fired 93 attorneys that were republican appointees. Why do the democrats make this into a scandal when it is not an issue? Will Hillary, like Bill, fire all her opponents if she becomes president? Will Obama?

In conclusion: The liberal socialist/communist democrats and NBC are still at their old game of scandalize and destroy their "enemies" while deceiving the public. They are using the legal system to unconstitutionally confront the president and they are wasting taxpayer dollars to it with. No court that upholds the U.S. Constitution would ever issue subpoenas for the firing of U.S. Attorneys in the first place. So again we see courts owned and operated by the left that operate unconstitutionally. Still, it is so refreshing to see the democrats get irate when a republican like Bush makes a direct hit one of their most valuable tools and resources for destroying America, U.S. attorneys.

My Suggestion: Bush should immediately fire all the democrat appointees which he has the right to fire, and across the entire federal government. I would love to see all the democratic holdovers from previous administrations sent packing. And I would love to see the liberal neo-socialist homofeminist anti-Christ movement dissolved. Moreover, this would be a good opportunity for President Bush to stand and fight the democrats; Bush voters need to see Bush’s strength against internal threats. Also, voters should never vote for democrats because we see everyday they are eager to waste millions of tax dollars for their malicious endeavors.

I have a thought: Wasn’t the number of mothers in America much less in 1965 than today, like in the millions less? And wasn’t the number of mothers who have careers and/or intending on careers much less in 1965 than today, like in the millions less? And wasn’t the number of daycare centers much less in 1965 than today, like thousands if not hundreds of thousands. And aren’t the daycare centers today overloaded with children where quite common infections of ringworm, herpes, and in some cases very terrible infections like tuberculosis afflict these children. I don’t think many parents even realize their children have been infected because the symptoms are dormant. Furthermore, I don’t remember daycare centers being and issue in the news or anywhere else for suburban homes in 1965. Moms outside the city where we lived were always at home with their children and dads were at work. I only remember that the inner city mostly black people received daycare as a part of welfare in the 60’s, possibly after 1965. Inner city government daycares started popping up in step with the homosexual, feminist, and civil rights movements. How can NBC have an accurate census if they avoid facts such as population, career, daycare center, and divorce increases?

In conclusion: Mothers chose a career when they chose to be a mother, anything else then the child is being neglected. This is more NBC liberal neo-socialist homofeminist propaganda so that feminists can brainwash American women in believing they should continue on the current path toward dominating America. The homofeminists at NBC want all of female America in careers breaking glass and marble ceilings so that eventually the homofeminists and not necessarily female America can step in and eventually dominate the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government. And as far as children are concerned, remember that homofeminists vote to legalize abortions.

My suggestion: Mothers and fathers should stay happily married. Mothers should stay home with their children and let the fathers work. Mothers should home-school their children. And mothers should teach their children about the dangers in the real world such as disease and homofeminism. (Mom, if you really want a career, take on-line courses while you are being an at home mom. By the time the children become responsible young adults, you will probably have earned a masters or doctorate. When all the children reach 18 years of age then go break glass ceilings if you wish, and let dad retire. The point is that children and family come first, career second, and all in its due time. This way you won’t feel guilty and you will be a much happier mom.)

I have a thought: Will this department be entirely manned and secured by feminists, homosexuals, non-white racists like most African American Muslims, and residually anyone else who supports the progressive liberal neo-socialist anti-Christ movement (like our Universities). Will the socialists in this new department be held accountable for any wrongdoing or extremism on their part? Do Hillary Clinton and Obama support this type of bigger more controlling type of government? What if Hillary or Obama become president, will they endorse bills like this until the progressive liberal neo-socialist anti-Christ movement socialists have absolute dominion over the U.S. Will Hillary or Obama then hand the U.S. and its people over to China or the Muslim nations in exchange to have their own dictatorship. Will the republicans and President Bush shoot down this unconstitutional bill and any other unconstitutional bill that the democrats write?

In conclusion: We have clearly seen, during the Bush years, that democrats don’t do anything unless it is to progress their progressive liberal neo-socialist anti-Christ movement. Democrats behave unconstitutionally, ruthlessly, underhandedly, and aggressively to get to the next level of absolute and permanent control of the U.S. This new department is just another liberal taxation without uniform representation expansion of the federal government in favor of the progressive liberal neo-socialist anti-Christ movement. And democrats will destroy anyone who stands in their way by using the tools and resources they have already assimilated along the way with the judiciary being their most valuable tool. Bill HR808 will be just another tool and resource they will use to destroy traditional Christian America and the Christians who are in the field promoting the only true peace the world can have. Democrats want America to be flooded with millions of immigrants who are anti-Christian, and who bring their communist worlds and ideologies with them, and who will be used to destroy more Christians with this HR808 bill.

My Suggestion: Contact your representatives and tell them to trash this bill and any bill the democrats propose, gridlock is better than defeat!

I have a thought: Wasn’t Palosi and her democrats, including the liberal media, attacking Bush for monitoring phone calls by potential terrorists inside and outside the U.S.? And here we have Palosi and her democrats’ wanting to monitor and record citizens who want to communicate with their elected representatives in private. Is Palosi and her comrades setting themselves up to have a new and very powerful scandal engineering machine to take down republican opponents. Is this an extended attempt, by the democrats, to criminalize and get rid of more republicans by politicizing any conversation they may have? Was this bill born from the ferocious liberal appetite developed for the rolling of republican heads like Scooter Libby? Will President Bush and our republicans stop this bill from being law? What would happen to Americans if Hillary Clinton became president and unconstitutional bills like this were written up throughout her presidency?

In Conclusion: I see it happening in my state and in the federal government; liberal socialist democrats who want Christianity and conservatives completely removed are constantly manning and engineering the legal system to allow for all their liberal desires and to keep themselves in power. They actively, quickly, and quietly push through unconstitutional bills that the people are unaware of because the liberal socialist media, like CNN, won’t report these activities to the American people. Only conservative activists who are in the trenches finding out these atrocities are also reporting them. Check out www.truthtellers.org. This organization will explain what evil the secular anti-Christ democrats are up to on a daily basis. The Democrats, their prosecutors, and their media will use these conversations to further neuter the will of the people from challenging their socialist progressive agendas. ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN will target Christian citizens and their conservative representatives for scandals but they will not target their own democrats. Remember that throughout history, the first thing any communist takeover did was to identify and record their opponents, who ever they might be. Their opponents were then dealt with severely after the takeover was completed.

My Suggestion: Contact your representatives and tell them that you do not want HR984 to become law.

I have a thought: Everyone I know in mainstream America would gag at the thought of eating raw fish eggs in any context. We eat hen eggs, fried or scrambled, as this is part of our culture. And we can afford hen eggs. We often have ham, sausage, bacon, hash browns, toast, biscuits, sausage gravy, juice, milk, and/or coffee with our hen eggs, all for less than five dollars. Mainstream Americans do not eat caviar. Most Americans have never tasted caviar and probably never will. My gut feeling is NBC has made the assumption that all of us here in the heartland enjoy caviar on a daily basis because our personnel chefs prepare the delicacy for us in our multi-million dollar estates. I wonder if the people at NBC would cringe at the idea of relocating to our heartland, eating hen eggs, and living like we do; I think we simply could not satisfy their caviar addictions. Have the NBC people ever viewed Paris Hilton’s “The Simple Life”?

The “Pact of Umar” is an ancient document, written by Umar, that dictates how the conquered Christians and Jews will behave under Muslim rule. The following is a letter, in part, to Umar from the conquered Christians and Jews, 7^th century A.D.:

“This letter is addressed to Allah’s servant Umar, the Commander of the Faithful, by the Christians of such-and-such city. When you advanced against us, we asked you for a guarantee of protection for our persons, our offspring, our property, and the people of our sect, and we have taken upon ourselves the following obligations toward you, namely: We shall not build in our cities or in the vicinity any new monasteries, churches, hermitages, or monks’ cells. We shall not restore…any of them that have fallen into ruin or which are located in the Muslims’ quarters. We shall keep our gates wide open for passerby and travelers. We shall provide three days’ food and lodging to any Muslims who pass our way… We shall not teach our children the Koran. We shall not hold public religious ceremonies. We shall not seek to proselytize anyone. We shall not prevent any of our kin from embracing Islam if they so desire. We shall show deference to the Muslims and shall rise from our seats when they wish to sit down. We shall not attempt to resemble the Muslims in any way…. We shall not ride on saddles. We shall not wear swords or bear weapons of any kind, or ever carry them with us…. We shall not display our crosses or our books anywhere in the Muslims’ thoroughfares or in their market places. We shall only beat our clappers in our churches very quietly. We shall not raise our voices when reciting the service in our churches, nor when in the presence of Muslims. Neither shall we raise our voices in our funeral processions…. We shall not build our homes higher than theirs….” This letter has the essence of the Jewish / Nazi relationship.

Our textbook, ISBN 0-393-92536-6, claims that the Islamic Arabs did not force conversion on the Christians and Jews. However they did force submission to Islam and oppression of other religions. Amazingly, the authors fail to comment that there is no difference between conversion and submission with religious oppression; the end result is the same.

In class, we learned that the Shiites are the most conservative and are Islamic fundamentalists (the warrior type) because they follow the most direct line of Islamic leaders to Muhammad: Abu-Bahr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, and with the emphasis on Ali because he was Muhammad’s warrior, cousin, and son-in-law (HELLO). The Shiites represent submission or death.

Also in class, we learned that the Sunnis are the most liberal, not as aggressive, and are accepting to other religions such as Christianity and Judaism. This all came about because the Umayyad family focused Islamic rule for a slightly different purpose in the 7^th century A.D. called taxation.

With respect to the profiles of Shiites and Sunnis, the “Pact of Umar” reads like a combination of Shiite and Sunni rule because the Christians and Jews are first conquered by the sword and held captive under Islamic rule but then also allowed to practice their own religion as long as it is kept out of sight, and provided they pay taxes to Islam.

My thoughts: Does this “Pact of Umar” have any correlation with what we see happening in America today? Does the Muslim Barack Obama identify with the historical Shiite-Sunni relationship? Barack used the Koran to be sworn in to the Senate. Barrack is a liberal and liberals love taxation. And Barack wants America to withdraw and stop resisting (fighting) the Islamic ideology. Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of Muslims in America are black or non-white Caucasians and they are planning to vote for Barack. And as an unspoken rule of thumb, and through Affirmative Action, American government hires mostly black people. Black people are increasingly holding political offices, in the judicial and legislative branches. And what about the ACLU? Are Muslims increasingly becoming members of the ACLU? The ACLU uses its judges to keep Christianity out of the public but I have yet to hear about them attacking Islam. And are the NAACP leaders enrolling Muslims? I have seen the people at NAACP meetings, many dress like Muslims and speak of the Koran.

In conclusion, Islam is expanding, specifically in America where organizations like the ACLU, Affirmative Action, and the NAACP are involved. And even though Shiites and Sunnis fight each other, blood is still thicker than Christianity, or Judaism, or Hinduism, or anything else. Moreover, the expansion of Islam in America can mean only one thing; American Christians and Jews will one day be sending a letter to the Islamic ruler of America promising that We The People shall not do or say anything that might offend you and we will support you by taxation, just don’t harm us.

My opinion and advice is that Islam does not belong in America and neither does its followers. Sooner than later, the U.S. Constitution needs amending in order force Islam out of America. And America needs a coherent conservative republican leadership to get the job done.

*As a final note, don’t vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton either because feminism and communism are destructive too (see my upcoming post). Vote conservative republican!

1. “A routine, $80 tooth extraction might have saved him.”

2. “If his mother had been insured.”

3. “If his family had not lost its Medicaid.”

4. “If Medicaid dentists weren't so hard to find.”

5. “If his mother hadn't been focused on getting a dentist for his brother, who had six rotted teeth.”

All of the suggestions in this story imply that this boy’s death is the fault of the government and that the government should ramp up its welfare programs so that other children won’t die of bacteria spreading to their brains due to rotting teeth and abscesses.

I have a different thought – how about this boy died because his irresponsible mother, who is probably on welfare and government programs, was to irresponsible to train and enforce her children to be responsible for cleaning their teeth on a daily basis. Did this mother even buy dental floss, toothpaste, toothbrushes, and mouthwash for her children? This article does not mention anything about these children’s teeth cleaning routines at home. If a mother is on welfare and other government programs then there is simply no excuse for not getting her children to a dental check up at least once a year. This is simply pure irresponsibility.

I am not young and my teeth and gums are beautifully clean and healthy because I floss, brush, and use mouthwash after each meal daily.

My opinion, after reading this story, is that Mary Otto, the Washington Post, and MSNBC, all want taxpayers to shore up more financial and medical support for people like this Boy’s mother so that she can have more children and keep the cycle of irresponsibility continuous. All the while blaming others for their problems. I personally feel sorry for children who have parents like this mother.

In conclusion, any mother with children who is on welfare has free access to fundamental health care and materials for her children to prevent such a tragedy as this. The only reason this tragedy happened is because the mother is irresponsible and should be held accountable, not the government and/or the taxpayers.

I’m going to go brush my teeth right now!